Tag Archives: Second Amendment

Will Someone Please Reign This Agency In

The BATFEces is at it again. They have changed a 40 year old interpretation of a law.

Reversing an interpretation of the Gun Control Act that has been on the books for more than four decades, ATF today posted a ruling declaring any shipment of a firearm by a manufacturer (FFL) to any agent or business (e.g., an engineering-design firm, patent lawyer, testing lab, gun writer, etc.) for a bona fide business purpose to be a “transfer” under the Gun Control Act of 1968.  As a consequence, legitimate business-related shipments will now require the recipient to complete a Form 4473 and undergo a Brady criminal background check.  In many instances, these requirements will force shipments to a third party, thereby lengthening the process and the time that the firearm is in transit.

What do I find troubling about this? It is not that this ruling will affect a large number of people. It is the arbitrariness (Is that a word? If not, it should be.) of it. There is no reason to have made this change. Not one firearm transferred under these conditions has been used in a crime. Yet, they feel the need to suddenly change the interpretation.

QOD

By CALLING ATTENTION to ‘a well regulated militia,’ the ‘security’ of the nation, and the right of each citizen ‘to keep and bear arms,’ our founding fathers recognized the essentially civilian nature of our economy. Although it is extremely unlikely that the fears of governmental tyranny which gave rise to the Second Amendment will ever be a major danger to our nation, the Amendment still remains an important declaration of our basic civilian-military relationships, in which every citizen must be ready to participate in the defense of his country. For that reason I believe the Second Amendment will always be important.
-John F. Kennedy

Who is the Real Haters and Bigots

The Southern Poverty Law Center is now equating those who support the Second Amendment with racists. This irritates me to no end. They ignore the fact that gun control laws in this country began as laws to keep firearms out of the hands of minorities. This march is not targetted at just Obama. It is targeted at all parts of the federal government as a message that we will not stand for infringement of our rights. If the NAACP/LULAC/NOW or any other rights groups marched on Washington, would they be saying that it is not needed because Obama has no intentions of restricting their rights? I have a real problem with how they are saying because the Second Amendment rights movement has won a few victories we should sit down and shut up.

Disappointed in the NRA

The NRA has endorsed Rick Perry for Texas Governor. Don’t get me wrong. He has been a strong supporter of gun owners’ rights. However, there is a more ardent supporter of the individual right to bear arms, Debra Medina. By endorsing Perry now, they have shown that they prefer to support the safe option. If they wanted to endorse Perry, they should have done so after the primaries. This shows that the NRA really supports the status quo, not strengthening support for our Second Amendment rights.

Hooray For Free Speech

Federal Judge Orders Tarrant County College to Allow a Protest in Support of Concealed Carry on Campus

FORT WORTH — A federal judge granted a temporary restraining order Friday allowing two Tarrant County College students to stage their “empty holster” protest at the community college campuses.

U.S. District Judge Terry R. Means said in his ruling that Clayton Smith and John Schwertz Jr., who attend TCC Northeast Campus in Hurst, can wear empty gun holsters and hand out fliers in “public-forum areas including, but not limited to, public streets, sidewalks, and common or park areas.” TCC wanted to restrict the protest to a small designated area.

But the students cannot wear their holsters in classrooms or hallways. They are protesting for the right of licensed gun owners to carry concealed handguns on college campuses.

You know, it is kind of ridiculous that administrators are in fear of an empty holster. I can not see how this could be any kind of disruption in actual learning, and it might open up discussion between the opposing view points. If the college administrators had just done this to begin with, this protest probably would have gone by without notice. Many people call college campuses bastions of free speech. Unfortunately, to many colleges are actually bastions of approved speech. If the campus administration does not like what is being said, they will shut it down.

A little information about the firearm (and the ammunition available in the USA) used in the Fort Hood Attack from the ATF

FTB classified SS196 ammunition as not armor piercing.

The FN 5.7 (Fabrique Nationale) pistol is a semiautomatic pistol in 5.7 X 28 mm caliber.

FTB has also examined a 5.7 X 28 mm projectile that FN Herstal has designated the “SS196.” The SS196 is loaded with a Hornady 40 grain, jacketed lead bullet. FTB classified SS196 ammunition as not armor piercing ammunition under Federal firearms statutes.

According to FNH USA, FN Herstal tested the SS192 ammunition. SS192 ammunition did not penetrate the Level IIIA vests that were tested. FNH USA states that SS196, Hornady V-Max 40 gr. bullets fired from a 4-3/4 inch barrel did not penetrate the Level II vests that were used in testing.

FNH USA has informed FTB that SS192 is no longer imported for commercial sale to the United States and that commercial sales of 5.7 X 28mm ammunition are restricted to the SS196 (not armor piercing).

To summarize, neither the pistol or its ammunition are normally capable of penetrating body armor. Neither of these items are “cop killers” in anything but the very loosest definition of the term.

And, so it begins.

A US House Representative from IL has submitted a bill (H.R.45) requiring the licensing of all firearm owners and registration of all firearms. Contact your US House Representative and let them know you want this stopped. I will be calling mine.

Links to the bill: Link1, Link2